Showing posts with label Boehner plan. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Boehner plan. Show all posts

Wednesday, 27 July 2011

Short-term debt hike confounds 2 sides

WASHINGTON — Neither the House nor the Senate has a clear path forward for must-pass legislation to allow the government to continue to borrow to pay its bills, putting lawmakers and financial markets alike on edge less than a week before the deadline for heading off a first-ever U.S. default.
The pressure is on House Speaker John Boehner, who's being forced to rewrite his debt and budget plan after nonpartisan congressional scorekeepers said it wouldn't reap the savings he's promised.

The Ohio Republican also needs to shore up his standing with tea party-backed conservatives demanding deeper spending cuts to accompany an almost $1 trillion increase in the government's borrowing cap.

In a national, prime-time address Monday, the president declared that Boehner's plan "would force us to once again face the threat of default just six months from now. In other words, it doesn't solve the problem."

But debt ceiling increases are by definition temporary. Since 1993, when the debt ceiling stood at $4.37 trillion, Congress raised the limits 13 times, in amounts that lasted from three months to almost five years. The debt ceiling was raised 18 times during President Ronald Reagan's two terms, including three times during his 1984 re-election run, for an average length of about five months. House Republicans point out that is a shorter period than the six-month debt ceiling increase their plan would provide.

The problem for Obama is that Boehner's plan ties a second debt ceiling increase to a broad scrubbing of entitlement programs such as Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security, with a goal of reducing long-term deficits by at least $1.8 trillion. White House officials fear that under such a plan, the debt ceiling would once again be pushed to a near-crisis point in January as lawmakers undertake what so far has been a Sisyphean task to cut the costs of the nation's biggest benefit programs.

White House officials say that effort would be further complicated because it would be colored by election-year politics.

Boehner and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell both have accused Obama of being more worried about his own re-election than the fiscal health of the country. "With all due respect to the president, we have more important things to worry about than getting through the next election," McConnell said.

Obama, however, has said he would be willing to seek increases in the debt ceiling during an election year if they somehow would be guaranteed to pass, as they were in a proposal by McConnell.

"That way folks in Congress can vote against it, but at least it gets done," Obama said Friday. "I'm willing to take the responsibility. That's my job. So if they want to give me the responsibility to do it, I'm happy to do it."

For House Republicans, the two-step process was not always the preferred method either.

On June 13, Cantor asserted, "It's my desire to have one debt ceiling vote."

A week later, on June 21, he said: "I don't see how multiple votes on a debt ceiling increase can help get us to where we want to go. We want big reforms, we want big spending cuts and big changes to how this town works. And to me, it is a case of having to make some tough decisions. I am not so sure that if we can't make the tough decisions now, why we would be making those tough decisions later."

With six days left before the government exhausts its borrowing authority, Republican officials say they no longer have the luxury of planning a single debt ceiling increase to accomplish the deficit reductions they have in mind.

Those chances faded Friday when Boehner ended negotiations with the White House for a large package of $4 trillion in deficit reductions over 10 years in exchange for a $2.4 trillion increase in the debt ceiling. Boehner said he walked out of the talks because Obama had insisted on $400 billion more in tax revenue than the $800 billion that Boehner was willing to concede.

But Republicans believe the only way Democrats and the president will seriously consider structural changes to Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security is if the debt ceiling is on the line. Boehner's plan as outlined Tuesday would increase the debt ceiling by $900 billion and seek cuts in day-to-day spending that are greater than that. It then would require a joint committee of Congress to identify deficit reduction measures totaling at least $1.8 trillion. Congress would have to approve those cuts before granting a second debt ceiling increase of $1.6 trillion.

"At this late hour, any plan that's going to have significant deficit reduction is going to have to be a two-step plan," Boehner spokesman Brendan Buck said. "There's just not time to write all the reforms needed.

Tuesday, 26 July 2011

Obama, Boehner take cases on debt limit to nation

United States edged closer on Tuesday to a devastating default as Republicans and Democrats were deadlocked over competing plans to raise the debt ceiling, one week before a deadline to act.

President Barack Obama, in a televised address aimed at rallying public support for a package proposed by Democrats, warned that failure to increase the U.S. borrowing limit would severely hurt the nation.

At 1145 GMT, ICSC/Goldman Sachs release chain store sales for the week ended July 23 versus the prior week. In the previous week, sales were up 0.4 percent.

Redbook releases at 1255 GMT its Retail Sales Index of department and chain store sales for July versus June. In the prior period, sales fell 0.2 percent.

One of the biggest obstacles remaining: the size of the debt limit increase. House Republicans want an increase of $1 trillion — enough to last about six months, with future increases tied to more cuts and a House and Senate vote on a balanced budget amendment.
The Senate wants $2.4 trillion, enough to get through the 2012 election.
"Based on what we've seen these past few weeks, we know what to expect six months from now," Obama said during a prime-time address to the nation, calling on Americans to urge Congress to compromise.

House Speaker John Boehner said he tried to work with Obama, but the president "would not take yes for an answer."

Sources: House Speaker; Senate Majority Leader
"The sad truth is that the president wanted a blank check six months ago, and he wants a blank check today," Boehner said.
With a House vote scheduled for Wednesday on the Boehner plan and no timetable in the slower-paced Senate, few days would be left to reconcile the two before the government faces the prospect of default.

But there is movement: Both plans take tax hikes off the table, something Democrats had insisted upon as part of a grand deficit-reduction deal. Republicans have also softened their demand to make an increase in the debt limit subject to an immediate vote on a balanced budget amendment.
Both sides have settled on an immediate vote on at least $1.2 trillion in spending cuts. They've also agreed there should be a process to propose future cuts, and give them an up-or-down vote.
The House Republican plan is a modified version of the bill passed by the House, but rejected by the Senate last week. The vote on a balanced budget amendment would be delayed, and many of the spending cuts would be up to a congressional commission.
A number of conservatives said they won't support anything short of the original House position. "Washington wants a deal. Americans want a solution," said Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio.
The Senate plan, by Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., proposes $2.7 trillion in cuts over 10 years, with no reductions in entitlement benefits such as Social Security or Medicare.
Reid said it also meets two Republican demands: No tax increases and spending cuts at least as large as the debt limit increase.

Boehner plan

• No tax increases.
• Increases the federal debt ceiling by up to $1 trillion coupled with $1.2 trillion in spending cuts in discretionary programs over 10 years.
• Requires a second vote to raise the debt ceiling in 2012.
• Caps future spending. Failure to remain below caps would trigger automatic across-the-board spending cuts.
• Requires a vote on a balanced budget amendment after Oct. 1 but before the end of the year.
• Creates joint congressional committee charged with determining at least $1.8 trillion in spending cuts in entitlement programs, such as Medicare and Social Security, over 10 years. The House and Senate would vote for proposal on an up-and-down basis with no amendments. If passed, the president would be authorized to seek a $1.6 trillion increase in the debt ceiling.
Reid plan
• No tax increases.
• Raises debt ceiling by $2.5 trillion through 2012.
• $1.2 trillion in spending cuts over 10 years.
• $100 billion in savings that include reduced fraud and abuse in mandatory programs, changes Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, sales of the radio spectrum and changes in agricultural programs.
• $1 trillion in savings from winding down the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
• $400 billion in interest savings.
• Creates joint congressional committee to find future savings. The recommendations would receive an up-or-down vote by the end of 2011. Unlike Boehner’s plan, the increase in debt ceiling is not contingent on approval of this committee’s proposal.